Existing
Market.
My next move
would be expansion into larger firms greater than four attorneys and multiple
areas of practice. The software will be
more robust and powerful to handle more transactions and multiple profiles for
many attorneys/users.
Customer
1
|
She believes there is
opportunity to version solutions based on practice areas and form
partnerships with some of the independent solution providers. For instance, there are solutions for standard
forms that should be incorporated into my software solution. She also felt we should be thinking about
marketing and how we plan to get attorneys to buy our software.
|
Customer
2
|
He found our solution
to be more comprehensive than he imagined and found it challenging to think of
a next option for us and could not come up with any suggestions. He thought we should be thinking about data
security and encryption given the risk of client’s private information.
|
Customer
3
|
He believed there
was an opportunity to integrate within a firm’s website. When we talked about our idea for a client
portal, he said he would like his entire web and software presence to be managed
by one provider. Thought we should be thinking
about web design capabilities so we can provide an entire we package.
|
Given the
feedback from customers in our existing market, I feel confident we are on the
right track with our solution. Some
feedback suggests we should think about more integration/functionality, but I
am certain that will add complexity and slow us down initially.
I believe
we should keep our current offering but enhance it to better suit the needs of
a larger firm with many attorneys. Our
feedback has been limited to conceptual conversations and we need to develop a
beta version to really accelerate development into this new segment.
New Market.
My new
market will be focused on larger firms beyond solo practitioners with more than
four attorneys.
Customer
1
|
Felt there was a need
for consolidation of software and believes ours would be useful for them, especially
if there was benchmarking across the firm.
Thought we should focus more on automation and social media plug-ins
that allow them to focus more on lawyering and less on relationship maintenance.
|
Customer
2
|
Was hesitant about
one software package doing everything and thought that caused significant
risk. If we were to become unavailable,
her entire operation would stall. She
instead thought we should focus solely on case management and social.
|
What
surprised me the most was the customer who was against one software solution
handling everything. I never thought of
this point, and really felt that it had merit and is worth figuring out. I was pleased to hear that our approach to consolidating
customer/case management, accounting and marketing/social efforts were needed.
This new
market does not seem to value consolidation as much as the smaller firms. They have paralegals and office staff to
handle more of the administrative, marketing and financial tasks. It does not seem to favor the consolidation.
Hello Mario,
ReplyDeleteThis assignment and the feedbacks you received showed that your software already has the ability to the incorporated with existing firms. The fact that most of your interviews concluded with them believing your software can work better than their current ones really show promise of your business. The problem that was pointed out is very valid and if approached and addressed correctly, the idea could really change how legal firms work in the future.
Hey Mario,
ReplyDeleteThrough out the summer, your business concept has seemed incredibly solid, especially now with your interviews giving you positive feedback on your idea. Overall, you product would be extremely beneficial to current and future law firms by making the offices much more efficient and well tracked. As Yung-Teng said, fixing the issues your interviewees pointed out would be a tremendous leap forward for this idea.